By Fresh Facts Staff Reporter
The recent arrest of controversial social media activist, VeryDarkMan (VDM), by operatives of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has stirred a wave of public concern, igniting debates about the state of civil liberties, institutional integrity, and national security in Nigeria.
VDM, known for his blunt and unapologetic commentary on social injustice, celebrity culture, and government inefficiency, was reportedly picked up by the EFCC over allegations linked to cybercrime. However, critics argue that the real reason behind his arrest may be his fearless criticism of powerful individuals and public institutions.
The lack of clarity surrounding the arrest — with no formal charges made public at the time — has drawn widespread criticism from civil society groups, human rights lawyers, and online communities. Many view the action as a blatant abuse of power and a misuse of the EFCC’s mandate, which is traditionally focused on combating economic and financial crimes.
“This is not just an attack on VDM, it is an attack on the constitutional right to freedom of expression,” said a human rights advocate who spoke to Fresh Facts. “The EFCC’s action sends a dangerous signal to digital activists and whistleblowers across Nigeria.”
Legal analysts have pointed to Nigeria’s Cybercrimes Act of 2015, particularly Section 24, which has frequently been used to target critics under vaguely defined offenses such as cyberstalking and incitement. Many argue that the law is increasingly becoming a tool for suppressing dissent rather than fighting genuine cyber threats.
Security experts warn that actions like this could have far-reaching implications for Nigeria’s fragile security architecture.
“Security is not just about arresting terrorists or fighting bandits. It’s also about protecting civil rights and maintaining public trust in institutions,” a senior analyst told Fresh Facts. “When institutions are perceived as political weapons, it undermines the rule of law and fuels public resentment.”
The EFCC’s involvement in a speech-related matter has also raised concerns about the politicization of security agencies. Critics argue that the agency’s focus on VDM diverts attention from its core mission of investigating high-level corruption and recovering looted funds.
“The EFCC is supposed to be chasing billion-dollar fraudsters, not arresting internet commentators,” a university professor noted.
Beyond the legal and institutional concerns, the arrest has intensified fears of rising digital censorship in Nigeria. Activists warn that if online critics continue to be targeted, it could create a chilling effect that discourages civic engagement and silences voices calling for accountability.
VDM’s arrest sparked swift backlash across social media platforms, with hashtags trending nationwide and supporters calling for his immediate release. Many see the incident as a reflection of growing tensions between Nigeria’s youthful digital population and a state apparatus struggling to adapt to the realities of online activism.
In response to the backlash, civil society organizations are calling for urgent reforms, including a review of the Cybercrimes Act, enhanced legal protections for whistleblowers, and the creation of an independent body to monitor rights abuses by law enforcement agencies.
As the dust settles on the VDM-EFCC saga, one thing is clear: the intersection of free speech, law enforcement, and digital activism in Nigeria is becoming a high-stakes battleground — one that could shape the future of civic engagement and national security for years to come.